Law Firm Fee Setting
If you’re already speaking with a potential client, you’re deep in the sales process. At this stage, knowing when and how to quote higher fees is the simplest way to boost your earnings. And unlike marketing changes, which require time and effort, securing a higher fee enhances a conversation you’re already having.
(310) 734-6073Need Help Setting the Right Fees?
Stronger Fee Conversations Increase Your Revenue Without Additional Work
Too many lawyers fail to see the strategic benefits of rising their rates. If you want to be less busy, work fewer hours, incentivize clients to work with associates, improve your collections, or break the cycle of getting referrals from fee-sensitive clients, you can address these problems by raising your rates–especially for new clients.
A Systematic Fee Framework Aligns Your Pricing With the Value You Deliver
To quote the right fee, you need to understand which structure best fits each client and situation. Yet most attorneys miss out on this opportunity because they lack a systematic approach to making this critical choice.
The decision hinges on one core question: How directly does your value depend on the time invested? When a client faces a potential business dispute, for example, simply sending a letter on your firm’s letterhead that resolves the issue delivers tremendous value, whether it took you 30 minutes or three hours to draft. Here, the value lies in your firm’s reputation and hard-earned expertise, not the hours spent writing.
This distinction becomes even more important when choosing among fee structures such as hourly billing, flat fees, hybrid models, or even value-based fees in the right cases.
Once you internalize this, you can confidently set the appropriate amounts, whether it’s a flat fee or an hourly rate. In some situations, this also includes deciding whether a retainer, such as a general, advance-fee, or evergreen retainer, is the more strategic option when a client needs ongoing support or when predictability matters.
This is exactly the kind of strategic fee-setting we’ve been helping law firms master for over 20 years.
Proper Timing Shapes How Clients Understand and Accept Your Fees
Many lawyers make the mistake of quoting fees too early, which prevents client vetting and context-building. If a potential client asks about fees before explaining their situation, that’s a red flag. Instead, first assess their priorities and the stakes involved.
Second, clients can only properly evaluate your fees when given the right context. While law schools don’t teach this skill, the stakes of each situation fundamentally transform fee discussions. Your clients need to understand the true value and importance of your work before hearing numbers – otherwise, you’re just encouraging them to compare prices rather than quality of representation.
Our Solution
For twenty years, we’ve been helping lawyers confidently select, quote, and communicate fees that reflect their true worth.
And as a result, our clients stand firmer and get paid better. Use the intake form on this page and become the next one.
Get StartedFrequently Asked Questions
In our experience, most law firms undercharge and don’t test the market enough to see what they could be charging. We often recommend raising their hourly and flat fees for new clients right away, but we do this selectively, for the right kind of potential clients.
It’s not unusual for us to suggest incremental increases of 10–25% (or even more) within 3–6 months, depending on the situation.
We may also evaluate whether capped fees make sense for certain matters, especially when clients appreciate budget predictability.
This is designed for law firms in nearly any practice area that bill by the hour, flat fee, or a mix of both. And it’s especially useful for firms representing individuals or organizations where clients are billed separately.
Firms using retainers such as advance, general, or evergreen retainers also benefit significantly from guidance on structuring them properly.
Yes, we have extensive experience helping firms navigate the RFP process.
For instance, we recently assisted a West Coast-based law firm in its expansion to a major East Coast market by advising on a successful response to an RFP from a major academic institution for regulatory and litigation services. Our advice covered the full lifecycle—from deciding whether to respond and crafting the initial proposal, through multiple interview rounds.
Our RFP guidance regularly includes strategic advice on meeting specific client requirements, such as billing guidelines, blended fee structures, and compliance with corporate outside counsel policies.
Our strategic advice has the least impact in scenarios where there is no opportunity for arm’s-length negotiation, typically due to a substantial power imbalance favoring the client.
The textbook example is insurance defense work. Large insurance carriers often prescribe fixed billing rates and strict fee caps for panel firms, leaving little to no room for individual firms to negotiate higher terms.
While such rigid, client-driven structures limit strategic fee flexibility, they represent the exception, not the rule. Fortunately, the vast majority of law firms are not in this situation, and are able to increase their rates if the act strategically.
The rules of professional conduct in most jurisdictions give lawyers wide latitude in structuring fees, requiring only that they be reasonable. This allows for significant creativity beyond standard hourly or flat fee arrangements, capped fees, blended rates, contingency fees, stage or phase-based billing, subscription or retainer models, and secured fee arrangements such as retaining liens.
Yes. We have extensive experience advising law firms that utilize contingency fees, whether as part of a broader mixed practice or as their primary and exclusive fee model. Our strategic recommendations are tailored to the unique economics of contingency work, focusing on case valuation, intake strategy, ethical compliance, and financial planning to build a sustainable and successful practice.
Ethical rules form the essential framework for all fee arrangements. While most states adopt a version of ABA Model Rule 1.5 requiring fees to be “reasonable,” standards can vary. For example, California prohibits fees that are “unconscionable.”
Beyond these general principles, specific rules apply to certain practice areas, such as the widespread prohibition against contingency fees in family law.
Crucially, compliance often depends on formal engagement requirements. Statutes like California’s Business and Professions Code §§ 6146-6147 mandate specific disclosures and delivery of contingency fee contracts; non-compliance can void the agreement and the right to collect. We help firms navigate this complex landscape, ensuring their fee strategies are not only effective but also ethically sound and legally enforceable in their specific jurisdiction.
Defining scope is a mandatory first step in ethical fee-setting, and is particularly vital for flat-fee arrangements. A vague scope creates a perverse incentive for the client to expand the work without expanding the fee, leading to uncompensated effort, collection delays, or even non-payment.
We help firms draft clear, precise scope provisions in their engagement agreements, focusing on creating boundaries that prevent scope creep, reduce disputes, and secure full payment, ensuring your fee accurately reflects the defined (and delivered) value.
Fee strategies for corporate, RFP, and insurance work are primarily a function of bargaining power and volume. Large institutional clients (such as corporations, insurers, and government entities) use the promise of high-volume, repeat business to formally negotiate lower rates and strict administrative compliance, often through RFPs.
Insurance defense represents the most extreme end of this spectrum, where preset billing guidelines and fee caps typically leave firms with little leverage, resulting in the deepest discounts.
The core principles of our strategic advice still apply here. We help firms navigate these volume-driven negotiations, prepare compelling RFP responses, and maximize their position within the client’s framework.